Tuesday, February 23, 2016
Ross, Barbara. Fogged Inn. New York: Kensington, 2016.
Julia Snowden and her boyfriend Chris have recently opened an evening hours restaurant in Busman's Harbor, Maine. After a corpse turns up in the locker, and several guests pay with tampered (although legitimate) gift certificates on the same evening, Julia becomes suspicious. Rather than leaving it for the officials, Julia can't resist the temptation to snoop on her own. Her apartment over the restaurant is broken into and the gift certificates are stolen. Julia uncovers evidence that the gift certificate recipients all have a connection. Who was the the recipient of the other gift certificate purchased in that lot who did not arrive? The main characters were likable, although I did not feel they were particularly well-developed in this fourth book in the series. It was my first time to read a book in this series although the first has been on my wish list. The characters were probably better developed in earlier installments. I have trouble believing that all of the guests would lie to the authorities. I did not really enjoy the way this one ended. I would love to make another comment, but I don't want to give away the plot. While the book is a pleasant one, it is flawed. I received an advance reader's copy from the publisher through NetGalley with the expectation a review would be written.
O'Connor, Carlene. Murder in an Irish Village. New York: Kensington, 2016.
Siobhán O'Sullivan runs the local bistro in Kilbane along with her siblings. When her brother James is accused of a murder that occurred after the grand opening of a hair salon where all attendees received a pair of scissors, Siobhán feels she has to investigate to clear the charges. He had a fight with the man, but most of her friends agree James would never kill a man and that he was too drunk to kill him. The local garda simply settles on him as the easiest suspect. The Irish names make the reading a bit more difficult. The author does provide a pronunciation guide for the names in the front. As with most cozies, it is not that difficult to puzzle out the perpetrator if enough clues are followed although the author does throw in one red herring near the end to make it a bit more interesting. The village atmosphere would have been enhanced if the characters had moved a little further out of the inner circle and more about the town itself. The novel felt as though it were driving a bit too much by conversation. I'm not certain if this is intended as the start of a series or not, but it's one I might revisit to see if the author develops the setting beyond the Irish names and occasional term. This review is based on an advance reader's galley provided by the publisher through NetGalley for review purposes.
Tuesday, February 16, 2016
Nelson, Alondra. The Social Life of DNA: Race, Repartations, and Reconciliation After the Genome. Boston: Beacon Press, 2016.
Alondra Nelson's exploration into African-American DNA ended up being more of a commercial for one firm, African Ancestry, and the pursuit of the political agenda of "reparation" than an honest look at DNA. The testing firm offers PatriClan and MatriClan testing, but Ms. Nelson does not go into detail in describing how the comparison database was built. The firm's website does not specifically state that persons in those countries were tested but states that it is based on lineages from the countries and ethnic groups. With the presence of many erroneous lineages, one would hope for a database with more reliability. Genetic genealogy speakers at national conferences all caution testers that the admixture is the least reliable portion of the test. Ms. Nelson never provides this caution. She does state that African Ancestry tells people "You will not learn countries or ethnic groups;" however, it is clear that they do provide that information, both from Ms. Nelson's examples pointing to ancestral origins in Ghana, Equitorial Guinea, Mozambique, and many other countries as well as to specific ethnic groups within those countries and the company's website. At one place, she does mention that African Ancestry has a base of 45,000 testers. If this includes the sample group, it is too small of a testing base.
Early in the book, Ms. Nelson discusses the Thomas Jefferson-Sally Hemings DNA case study. While she cites many scientific studies, her failure to include Helen F. M. Leary's discussion of the case entitled "Sally Hemings’s Children: A Genealogical Analysis of the Evidence" which appeared in National Genealogical Society Quarterly (volume 89, no. 3, 2001, pp. 165-207) is a serious omission.
On page 38, Ms. Nelson incorrectly identifies Greensboro as being in South Carolina instead of North Carolina. It is clear from the context of the materials, it was the one located in North Carolina. On page 66, she states that Ancestry by DNA operated from 2002-2009; however, this test is still available, misleading many persons into thinking they are testing with Ancestry.com's product. The company which originated the test (DNAPrint Genomics) went out of business in 2009.
On page 96, she makes a reference to NBC's "Who Do You Think You Are." NBC's last season airing the program was in 2012. It was then picked up by TLC.
In one place the author's information is dated due to changes too recent to have been included in the book. This occurs on page 10 where she refers to Ancestry.com's Family Tree Maker. On 8 December 2015, Ancestry.com announced that it was discontinuing sales of Family Tree Maker and syncing with their online trees effective 31 December 2015. On 2 February 2016, the sale of Family Tree Maker to Software MacKiev was announced.
The last part of her book focuses mainly on the idea that African Americans are owed "reparations" because of their enslavement and because of the suffering in the Jim Crow era. While these are big black marks on our nation's history, Ms. Nelson fails to present any arguments that might be raised against this agenda and address those. For example, I could see many people asking if African Americans are not better off in the United States today than they would be in their ancestral homelands. While many of the questions that could be potentially raised are difficult to address, the author's approach leaves readers feeling they have read only one extremely biased interpretation. Ultimately Ms. Nelson shows how some have used genealogy to bring cases to litigation, but that paper trails often end, and that genetic genealogy has the potential for bridging the gap. She does discuss promise and problems in this approach.
She includes a discussion of diasporas in an international sense which leads readers to ask questions about why other groups who suffered persecutions leading to similar diasporas are not also asking for reparations. She never addresses that question begging to be asked beyond a couple of examples that are really less similar to the slave trade than are some of the others.
I am not addressing whether or not I believe reparations are justified, but simply the lack of addressing the other side of the argument. While Ms. Nelson's book was potentially promising, its agenda and several errors that should have been corrected before it went to print, mar its impact. This review is based on a copy provided by the publisher through LibraryThing's Early Reviewer program with the expectation that a review would be written.